Back to: HOME > Archives & MSS > Modern Manuscripts Collections Papers of the Oxford University Labour Club 1939-1940 ProvenanceThe papers were given to Balliol College Library 28 September 1990 by Mr John Andrew Lawrence Hamilton (Balliol 1938-40, 1946048, Williams Exhibitioner, Domus Exhibitioner).
Mr Hamilton has provided background material for the Bulletin in his letters; the first accompanying the donation of the Bulletin (28 September 1990) and the second in reply to a number of questions sent to him by J Armstrong (15 Oct 1990): 1. 28 September 1990. [this donation comprises] a complete run of the Oxford University Labour Club Bulletin from no.1 (24 October 1939) to no. 21 (28 May 1940), with two occasional publications, ‘Imperialist War’ (about 28 February 1940) and ‘Socialism – How?’ (about30 May 1940). No. 14, for the reason explained therein, was one sheet only. The Bulletin appeared weekly during term through the first academic year of the war: 7 issues in the first term (having got ff to a late start) 8 in the Easter term and only 6 in the last term. Its first editor was CE Grundy ( New College), nos 1-5, followed by (Sir) Leo Pliatzky (Corpus), nos 6 & 7, and finally AA Wheater (Merton), from no.8 to the end. Contributors included CAR Crosland, PM Williams (his biographer), Roy Jenkins, GDH Cole (President of the OULC) and Christopher Hill – reviewing Isaiah Berlin’s life of Karl Marx in the Home University Library; (Sir) Kenneth Dover contributed film and theatre reviews. The genesis of this publication was the disappearance at the outbreak of war of ‘Oxford Forward’, until then the OULC’s journal, and its parent ‘University Forward’, the journal of the University Labour Federation. (‘ Isis’ also disappeared at the same time.) The ULF was unusual in that it was affiliated to the Labour Party although it accepted Communist Party members, which would at that time normally have debarred it from affiliation. The result of this was that the outbreak of the war led to a division of opinion within the OULC between those supporting the war, as the Labour Party of course did, and those opposing it as an ‘imperialist wart’ as the Communist Party did from very shortly after the start of the war, following the Comintern line. The main interest now in this publication is the development of the argument between the two sides, heightened by the Russian attack on Finland at the end of 1939. The ULF held a conference during the Christmas vacation, and the voting for and against the war may be found on p.11 of no.8 – it may surprise a reader of this generation. Though the margin at Oxford was narrower than in other universities, it was those opposed [to] the war who were in the majority; the Cambridge vote (a much larger one in total) was more decisively against the war (roughly 5:3), and the vote in the provincial universities was very heavily against the war (only a very small vote at Durham was at all close). (Why London does not appear I have no idea.) The result of this conference led about Easter to the disaffiliation of the ULF, and in Oxford to the s cession of those in favour of the war, including the Club’s senior officers, GDH Cole and GEF Chilver, to form a new Democratic Socialist Club – the first time, perhaps, that Roy Jenkins was associated with that name – even then it was sometimes reversed, ie Social Democrats. The OU Labour Club thus became in actual fact the OU Communist Club. By this time, of course, the German invasion of Denmark and Norway had begun, and by the end of term the debacle in the Low Countries and France had changed the picture dramatically. I have no idea what happened later to the left wing clubs in Oxford, r whether the Bulletin found a new editor and a new printer after Ale Wheater and I left to do our National Service. But when I returned to Balliol in 1946,m six years later, I was approached by a student Communist who seemed to think that I would know where the duplicator was! I still take a modest pride in having kept the publication going for so long and appearing regularly, despite taking examinations every term (‘sections’ of Greats, after a war-time emergency version of Classical Honour Mods), playing rugby and instructing for the University OTC, in which the war left me as the only infantry cadet, and keeping up some social life. It was hard work; only Wheater helped with the typing and supplicating, though we usually got some help with assembling and typing and duplicating, and we had to arrange distribution to the colleges. The very earliest issues were run off on a primitive hand-feed rotary duplicator, but we were able before long to buy a machine with automatic feed, though still very primitive. This was paid for out of the profits; we built up a circulation of almost 500 copies a week, although the undergraduate population of Oxford had been almost exactly halved by the coming of the war – from around 5200 to about 2600, if I remember correctly. Proportionately we achieved a higher circulation than ‘Oxford Forward’ had had. It is not impossible that we may have been the only undergraduate magazine ever to make a profit, let alone one of about 50%!’ 2. 15 October 1990. i. Many of the articles are unsigned (almost all the material relating to India for example) or only initialled. Was there any particular reason for this and do you recall the names of any of these contributors? ‘The main reason for articles going unsigned was that the contributors, particularly Indian students, did not want to get themselves in the authorities’ black books. In this connection it is perhaps permissible for me to say that, when I applied after the war for entry into the Colonial Service, I was told by the then Secretary of State in the Labour government of 1946 that he could hold out no hope of my being appointed to the Colonial Service at any time in the future; I got a similar reply when I applied, about 1954, for appointment as one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors of Schools. In the case of the Colonial Service, Lord Lindsay, then Master of Balliol, was in no doubt that it was my political activities in 1939-40 that explained my rejection; he had supported my application, and the Director of Recruitment for the Service at that time was a Balliol man. The only contributor I can recall is the author of ‘What of South Africa?’ , issue 4 – I believe this was AH Bunting, Oriel... You can presumably check with Oriel, or in University lists, and if you can confirm that he was from South Africa I would regard that identification as practically certain. [AH Bunting matriculated 1938, listed as a Rhodes Scholar from Witwatersrand University, South Africa in Oriel Record, January 1939, vol VII no. 8 p.369.] I think the author of ‘Letter from Poland#’ (issue 2) was an American Rhodes student, but I cannot be more precise. All editorials from issue 8 on were by the editor, AA Wheater. ‘Bill X’, issue 8, was probably Bill (WJ) Halse, Wadham, though I can’t think why he should have wished to conceal his identity in this place, while revealing it in others. the ‘Red Marin’ was indeed Biggs-Davidson in his case the reason for anonymity was, of course, that he was a serving officer in HM Forces.’ ii. The pamphlet ‘Socialism – How>’ is unsigned and contains no reference to the OULC. Was this deliberate and if so for what reason? Am I correct in assuming that the pamphlet was written mostly by AA Wheater and distributed in the same way as the bulletin? ‘I am sorry to say that \I can recall practically nothing about the authorship or the circumstances surrounding the publication of ‘Socialism – How?’ I am sure, of course, that I printed it, and this can hardly have been done without the knowledge of the OULC’s Executive Committee – which by then, of course, consisted only of student Communists. possibly the fall of France made them more wary than before of identifying themselves with opposition to the war. Te pamphlet cannot have been issued before 24 May 1940 – a speech by Amery of that date is mentioned on page 1.’ iii. Did the advertisements for The People’s Bookshop help to fund the bulletin or was the advert complimentary? ‘I am practically certain that we were paid by the People’s Bookshop for the advertisements which we printed – I think it was £1 a time. That may not seem much, but our total revenue from sales was, obviously, only some £2 per issue – around 4680 copies at 1 (old) penny!’ iv. In issue 15 *March 5 1940) Irish Murdoch ( Somerville College) is listed as a newly elected member of the Club’s Executive Committee (along with Roy Jenkins of Balliol. I wonder if you remember anything about her involvement with the OULC? ‘I regret to say that I have absolutely no recollection of Irish Murdoch., The Executive Committee elected in March never really functioned; it should have taken office at the start of the summer term, but by then the ULF had been disaffiliated from the Labour Party ad ht e Labour Party members and supporters within the OULC had seceded to form the Democratic Socialist Club. f, as seems probable, IM was one of those who seceded, I would not have met her at the committee’s meetings... You will probably realise that the outbreak of the war had a much greater effect on the number of men in residence than on the number of women. Men over 20 were called up immediately, with a few exemptions )medical student, etc, and those unfit for military service): no women were. Consequently, the proportion of women among the undergraduate population almost doubled.’ ListAll issues printed by JAL Hamilton (from issue 9 the place of publication is give as 22 Beaumont Street [ Oxford]. Issues 1-8, 14 and the pamphlets, ‘Imperialist War’ and ‘Socialism – How?’ do not list the place of publication.) 1. Issue 1. Friday 24 October 1939. 5 pp. Contents:
2. Issue 2. Friday 31 October 1939. 10pp. Contents:
3. Issue 3 Wednesday 8 November 1939. 10pp Contents:
4. Issue 4. Wednesday 15 November 1939. 10 pp. Contents:
5. Issue 5 Wednesday 22 November 1939. 6pp. Contents:
6. Issue 6 Wednesday 29 November 1939, 6pp. Contents:
7. Issue 7 Wednesday 6 December 1939, 6pp Contents:
8. issue 8, Wednesday 17 January 1940, 6pp. Contents:
9. Issue 9. Tuesday 23 January 1940. 6pp. Contents:
10. Issue 10. Tuesday 30 January 1940, 6pp. Contents:
11. Issue 11, Tuesday 6 February 1949, 6pp Contents:
12. Issue 12 Tuesday 13 February 1940 6pp Contents:
13. Issue 13 Tuesday 20 February 1940 6 pp Contents:
14. Pamphlet entitled ‘Imperialist War. Introducing an Exhibition on the Causes of War. Mar 2 nd & 3 rd, Frazer School of Dancing.’ Published Sunday 25 February 1940. 14 pp. All sections unsigned. p.1: ‘Facts, figures and quotations... have been collected, and, for the most part, arranged by EV Adams (Keble).’ Issue 15 includes a note by JAL Hamilton, ‘I should like to thank very much those members who have helped to produce the Bulletin and Imperialist War, especially PM Williams, AH Bunting and Douglas Lowe.’ Contents
15. Issue 14. Tuesday 27 February 1940. 1p. Contents:
16. Issue 15. Tuesday 5 March 1940. 6 pp. Contents:
17. Issue 16. Monday 22 April 1940. 5 pp. Contents:
18. Issue 17. Tuesday 30 April 1940. 6 pp. Contents:
19. Issue 18. Tuesday 7 May 1940. 5 pp Contents:
20. Issue 19. Tuesday 14 May 1940. [5pp. Contents:
21. Issue 20. Tuesday 21 May 1940. 5 pp. Contents:
22. Issue 21. Tuesday 28 May 1940 5pp. Contents:
23 Pamphlet entitled ‘Socialism – How?’ ND [?late May 1940] 6pp. all sections unsigned. Contents:
|
|||
You do not need to request permission to download or print one copy of any of the images on these pages for your personal private study or research purposes. The archives and manuscripts of Balliol College are open by appointment to enquirers in person at the Historic Collections Centre in St Cross Church, Holywell.
Enquiries should be sent in writing (email or post).
There is no charge for Archive enquiries, but donations for Archive purposes are always appreciated.
|